59 Comments
User's avatar
bluecurl3's avatar

Over the last 4 decades I have shouted from the rooftops about this very scenario, and was accused many times of being a Jew hater or antisemitic. It didn't matter how many facts or truth I was able to convey, to most Americans, it was nothing more than an antisemitic conspiracy theory. Now, the tide of truth has finally turned, and the great awakening has begun. Let us hope that the momentum stays strong, and Zionism can be vanquished to the dust bins of history.

Patrick Lawrence's avatar

"The tide of truth has finally turned"--an excellent phrase, bluecurl, so befitting of the moment.

We thank all of those commenting for taking the time to do so.

P.L.

LaVerne Karras's avatar

You know it, I know it and I'd suspect most in this comment section know it, but will it ever get to mainstream, remember who owns the MSM?

Eleanor's avatar

Unfortunately, I do not believe any "great awakening has begun" and certainly not amongst Americans. I think it will take the collapse of their country, to awaken them from their indoctrination.

Ally's avatar
Apr 15Edited

If the Grey Lady says it, it’s just what the establishment wants you to think—a distraction. Here’s what’s really going on:

https://www.patreon.com/posts/petrogas-dollar-155685759?post_id=155685759

The recent Iran attack has been decades in the making by the deep state MICIMATT oligarch blob that runs things. Zionist to be sure, but really seeking something much bigger: Control of the world’s energy supply and maintenance of the petro-LNG dollar. In So far as the US is an oligarchic kleptocracy, all the Wars and piracy are in the US oligarch’s interests. Noticing that the capitalists are all Zionists doesn’t really further understanding or present a solution, whereas realizing that Imperialism is the last stage of capitalism does.

Tim N's avatar

I believe you are right: the war was and is definitely in the US' interests, for their last stab at controlling oil worldwide and stopping China's rise. A lot of the talk now seems to be that the war serves Israel's interests and not the US', but one cursory look at US war-making and bullying since the end of WW2 shows us that US foreign policy is in service to the US Ruling Class. Israel's interests in the region dovetails perfectly with US interests, so every move made for Israel is also a move made for the US. How could it be otherwise? I think a lot of what amounts to theater lately is just our Ruling Class shifting as much blame as possible away from themselves and onto Israel.

To me, the entire ill-considered war, especially the belief that if you murder enough of a country's leaders and citizens they will then rise up and overthrow their government, is classic neocon stupidity and wishful thinking. Are they Zionists? Sure. But they're American Zionists, interested in forwarding US hegemony. Israel will be gone well before the US will be, and that moment of reckoning is coming when the US' "unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Middle East" finally sinks. Then what?

Eleanor's avatar

Many thanks for link- brilliant analysis by Richard Medhurst

Ed's avatar

If Israel could get away without even a slap on the wrist for their murderous, premeditated attack on the USS Liberty in June 1967, then America would NEVER hold Israel to account for any of their barbaric behavior over the subsequent almost 60 years.

America's sick, psychotic infatuation with the State of Israel is going to play a major role in the downfall of this country. We are seeing this come to pass in real time.

Tom Welsh's avatar

What happened to US "democracy"? Well, we know that the founding fathers explicitly rejected democracy, which they identified as "mob rule". But the citizenry as a whole were supposed to have some influence on national policy - weren't they?

Martin Gilens's 2014 book "Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America" demonstrated that US government policies are closely correlated with the wishes of the super-rich, but hardly at all with the wishes of the mass of the people.

So are all the super-rich either Jewish or subject to Zionist control?

Paula's avatar

See Ellen Brown's article, All Wars Are Bankers Wars. Many early US leaders tried to create a national bank and currency and all were assassinated or attempts were made. It goes back to Rothschilds and the Bank of England. If we only knew our history, we would know who we are.

Carolyn L Zaremba's avatar

"US government policies are closely correlated with the wishes of the super-rich, but hardly at all with the wishes of the mass of the people." Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels told the world this in 1847.

Kojo's avatar
Apr 15Edited

Go through each industry in the country and examine the management and top shareholders in the main/biggest companies/institutions. Especially the finance sector. Draw your own conclusions.

From own experiences in academia for example, I would think the conclusions should be blindingly obvious.

But try for yourself. Finance? Tech? Retail? Consumer goods? Cultural institutions? Entertainment industry? Media? What percentage of total GDP is that?

And that's before the fact that AIPAC owns every congressman and senator.

If Chinese or Hindus or muslims had HALF this much influence.... it would have been called out and halted already. But no let's cloud it some more, shall we?

Tom Welsh's avatar

But why did this happen?

Kojo's avatar
Apr 15Edited

Few social outcomes happen based on a single driver.

A couple that are obvious:

- a nation that worships money unquestioningly, leaves the door wide open to corruption

- if that country also turns a blind eye to nepotism and tribalism, well that's strike two

Again just going back to own experiences in academia was blindingly obvious how governing boards and steering commitees had a clear bent, and how that bent for decades kept resulting in very specific types of nominations for positions, and approvals of certain candidates. Until the idea of institutional leadership reflecing diversity, let alone equality or merit, was completely a joke. And if you said a single word, god help you - you would be smeared and your career finished.

Mark Watson's avatar

Kojo,

The replacement of promotion by merit with ideological purity has been central to this issue . The "intellectuals" have been purged in favour of ideologists who defend nonsense with fervour and absolute loyalty even in the face of reality .

Kojo's avatar

Well that - and tribal bothers in the zionist cause. Virtually every major institution. And the institutions function in accord with that.

LaVerne Karras's avatar

As the article znd Max Blumenthal pointed out, this has been a long term plan. Consider the Balfour Declaration and the Zionists that pushed for it, do you really think there was no planning even then, not just in the US, but the UK, Germany, France and any country that had even a remote chance of influencing the progression of their plans. Conspiracy theory? Maybe but when compared to history there are a lot of points of correlation.

Tom Welsh's avatar

Agreed. In fact, having read a dozen or so books about Zionism and the Nakba, I am clear that Zionism arose in the 1880s or earlier and already insisted that all Gentiles must be ejected from Palestine.

What interests me is how Jews have got such a stranglehold on the worlds of finance and politics. As far as I can see, research denies that Jews are any more intelligent than others (whereas Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans actually are). Presumably Jews must have evolved a cultural system that enabled them to take over whole societies. In a way that might be a positive sign, in that it implies that large numbers of people can sometimes agree to cooperate for centuries toward common goals.

But the question remains: why have Jews (only) done this?

LaVerne Karras's avatar

This is purely anecdotal, but I worked for a company owned by a Jewish guy, one of my jobs was engineering projects and getting them done. I'd send out RFQs for the job, receive the quotes and the owner would farm the project out to a company he knew through the synagogue, I stopped doing that after a few times and just as a side note, his brother, who had been in the IOF, was the complete opposite, and lunch for him was(don't tell my brother) a bacon burger.

Tom Welsh's avatar

Yes, that does furnish a helpful clue.

Tom Welsh's avatar

Another odd thing that I noticed long ago: it’s impossible to tell (without noticeable and perhaps resented inquiries) who is Jewish and who isn’t.

The first company I worked for was a tiny British concern that made its own computers for stockbrokers and the like. The managing director was a well-spoken chap called Lewis Harris, whom I remember in a long, expensive-looking coat and pricey shoes. The joke among my colleagues was that he had previously run a company that made sausages, but believed that his generic “management expertise” would enable him to make a success out of the computer startup. It went out of business suddenly, just through running out of money.

Was Mr Harris Jewish? I have no idea, and I never heard of him again. But I would be willing to bet that he ended up a lot richer than I have done.

Eleanor's avatar

I have found that highly intelligent people are mostly respectful of other people and, where difference of opinion occurs, they will debate the matter, without either personal attacks or bad language; they will stick to the subject under discussion. Stupid people can be very sly and manipulative.

Michael P Peck's avatar

Better record-keeping and coordination.

John D's avatar

An excellent article, Patrick. Even better than usual.

Glad to see that you dated this takeover to the beginning of the post-WW II era.

Paula's avatar

It looks like the Zionazis are gearing up for a huge false flag event to stop the elections, that they will lose in mightily, before they even occur.

Ally's avatar

Nope. They don’t need to stop elections for the US empire to be managed to their liking. Elected officials aren’t the ones running things.

Tedder130's avatar

Zionism in Israel has elevated greed and hatred to state policy. Now, whether or not 'hatred' is manufactured in service to military aggression is immaterial as it is still hatred. And Israeli greed for land, property, and control is undeniable. It is noteworthy that greed and hatred are violations of all the principles of Judaism and more belong to the worship of Baal that is portrayed in Iran's Leggo movies. Again, in terms of Judaism, Zionism does not belong no matter how much the men and women who speak for Israel.

On the other hand, Israel would not exist without Christian Zionists and they, too, practice a form of greed and perhaps hatred. Their eschatological lust for the End Times is also devoid of Christianity no matter how much they long for the Second Coming and their Rapture, and also belongs to the worship of Baal.

Finally, American hegemonic policy is no less driven by greed and the hatred engendered by White Supremacy. Plus, American elites have been after Iran's resources since 1953 and the overthrow of Iran's Mosaddegh.

Altogether, in Biblical terms, we see the ascendance of Baal as too many leaders are poisoned by greed and hatred. It is no wonder that we see the alliance of Zionist Israel and part-Zionist America.

Ohio Barbarian's avatar

True, so now there must be a counter-coup. The only way Big Tech can save their precious AI data centers in Dubai, to name just one example of looming oligarchical losses, is to end this War of Israeli Aggression against Iran to restore the trade routes.

Trump won't do it because Netanyahu clearly owns him, so the easiest thing to do is to 25th Amendment his ass, and the stage is being set.

The New York Times is portraying Vance as a reasonable, acceptable option to their audience. Republican Senators have started to use the E-word, Extreme, to describe Trump. Trump's handlers are allowing him to do the batshit craziest of things, such as posting that absurd Trump the Messiah with the Carthaginian god to whom children really were sacrificed floating over his head.

These oligarchs, one of whom is definitely Peter Thiel, and another is probably George Soros, have to have someone in there who can say NO to Israel and make it stick, and Vance is their most convenient and obvious choice in this month of April, 2026.

Trump's days in office are literally numbered, possibly in the double digits.

Elizabeth Hall's avatar

With all due respect, why is your focus of blame casting only by name on Trump? Have you forgotten Biden, who amongst many behaviors of allegiance, got down on bended knee in the Oval Office in working hours to the then Israeli president and a female government official?

Jim KABLE's avatar

So slow - so long in coming - thanks to Haberman and Swan - and to Blumental. And your own understanding of what was left out in the NYT piece. Thanks!

Mark Watson's avatar

It is somewhat encouraging that you can at least write and speak of this without being branded "antisemitic" . As LaVerne pointed out who owns or has control of the MSM? The world is ruled to a large degree by the hedge funds which allows "other peoples money" to be used to control the world.

BKBlair's avatar

Consider what happened in Iran in 1979. Then take a look at the long history England played in carving up Persia for a Jewish settlement. Please consider using this timeline. It begins in 1516 and continues into the 21st century. https://www.palquest.org/en/overallchronology?show=intro Then look closely at PDJT's left hand in that picture with Netanyahu.

I have enjoyed your writing and perspective in the past. I hope you will consider the perspective of others and not rely on the The New York Times to remain neutral. Do you take the time to listen to PDJT?

Eleanor's avatar

Many people seem to implicitly suggest that the fault lies with Trump being subservient to Netanyahu. If this was the case, Trump would be removed from office, therefore, it is obvious that Trump's antics are in alignment with America's interests.

Gulam's avatar

Noone has mentioned the Rothschilds' cartel. Does it have no bearing on how things are directed, then?

Kojo's avatar

That a coup against democracy in America had taken place is not news - it took place over 40 years ago, and it had been proven in academic research for over a decade now

https://archive.org/details/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc

So the NY Times did not offer any news there.

As for AIPAC aka ZionistPAC owning congress, senate and white house, frankly that was not news either. Even Trump himself has long openly stated that Miriam Adelson (again ZionistPAC) owns him.

eg's avatar

Noted. Now when can the other fictions about America be abandoned?